Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Fascists and libertarians both make the
same error, from opposite directions. They believe that there is a
qualitative difference between people who are a part of the state and
people who are not a part of the state. Fascists think that people
inside the state are better than people outside the state; the
libertarians think the opposite. In fact I see no reason why either
one would be better than the other.
I have lived for extended periods of
time in both the former Soviet Union and in United States. In both
places I heard horror stories. The difference was that while in the
Soviet Union the worst perpetrator was the government, in America
they were private. I mean someone having every bone in his body
broken when he was a child, and another person having his brother
killed by his father and being anally raped by his father since he
was three. I mean the mafia killing an inventor and corrupting every
lawyer that his daughter attempted to hire. I mean a man breaking a
woman's skull so badly that she needed 40 stitches and walking away
with the child.
Whenever a human phenomenon is deified,
it is given powers that it does not deserve. As such it uses these
powers for wrong things. If state is deified, then it becomes an
organ of brutality and oppression. If family, or community, or the
public or the society, is deified, then it becomes an organ of
wrongdoing as well. Once again, I see no reason to see one as better
or worse than the other.
I once had the inspiration that the
English civilization and the American society work in opposite
directions. The English impose a solution from the top; the Americans
build up through spontaneous activity. This can be visualized as a
downward-pointing triangle on the part of the English and an
upward-pointing triangle on the part of the Americans. When the two
triangles intersect we get David's Star: What appears to be the
divinely ordained solution.
I work with two concepts:
Checks-and-balances and synthesis. Both have been used to create
superpowers. However neither is complete in itself.
Checks-and-balances by itself leads to gridlock, and synthesis by
itself leads to totalitarianism. What we need is a combination of the
two. At the bottom level, each party protects its rightful
prerogatives and in so doing checks the other's capacity for
wrongdoing. And at the top they work together to accomplish what
neither can accomplish by itself.
Both the state and not-the-state are
capable of various forms of wrongdoing. They are also both capable of
doing things that are right. When dealing with entities that are
capable of both right and wrong, the correct solution is checking
their wrongdoing and supporting them in what they do that is right.
This, once again, is the case both for people inside the state and
people outside the state.
The state, when left to its own
devices, can do terrible things. So can the general public. But both
are also capable of doing right. So the solution, once again, is
David's Star. Synthesis within the framework of check-and-balance.
Allow each triangle to check the other's capacity for wrongdoing and
work together to accomplish what neither can by itself.
In places where this is done, we see
any number of positive outcomes. We see this for example in Israel,
and the place is doing well enough. We also see this in some Asian
countries and some European countries. The two forces check and
balance each other, and then they work together to achieve what
neither can achieve by itself. The entities that have the capacity
for oppression are checked by people's affirmation of their
legitimate interests such as life and liberty. The entities that want
to eat up all the resources are checked by people who care about the
future.
Both fascists and libertarians are in
error. There is no reason to think that people in the state would be
better or worse than people outside the state. I propose the model of
synthesis within the framework of check-and-balance, allowing people
in both places to check each other's capacity for wrongdoing and work
together to achieve positive results.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home