Wednesday, August 17, 2016
When baby boomers were young, they were
into sex, drugs and non-conformism. When my generation was young,
they were into sex, drugs and conformism.
I have a friend named Drew Anderson who
works as a teacher in the inner city. He noticed that all the kids
were afraid to be different. One day he walked into a classroom
wearing yellow pants. Someone said, “Mr. Anderson, you are wearing
yellow pants.” He deadpanned, “Why are you so afraid to be
different?”
Well I suppose the reason that they are
afraid to be different is their belief that if you are different, you
are a freak, a loser, a lunatic, arrogant or a sociopath. I have not
seen this belief help them a great deal. Most of these kids become
economically non-viable and wind up behind bars.
Their mentality is this: Idiotic. And
when the mentality of people around you is idiotic, your only chance
to not be an idiot is to reject the mentality.
This is of course in no way limited to
the ghetto. Many supposedly freedom-loving populations in places like South and Midwest are viciously assimilative. And in many parts of
the world this is even worse.
Really, what makes social tyranny
different from government tyranny? A case can be made that it is
worse. Democratic governments are elected, official, accountable,
checked and balanced. Societies aren't. Which gives them a green
light to violate people to a greater extent than is allowed to the
government.
In one case we see official power; in
the other case we see unofficial power. I would take official power
over unofficial power any day.
Are Jehovah's Witnesses, Southern
old-boy networks, Texas Oil, corrupt networks in law and medicine,
child rapists and wife-batterers, and the inner city gangsters and
Russian mafia better than the federal government? Absolutely not;
they are far worse. Yet they claim that they are the people, and that
those they hurt are not the people. They claim that they are
practicing liberty and constitutional rights, while viciously denying
real liberty and constitutional rights to those living under their
grip. They want freedom from the government even as they want to
impose de facto tyranny on their own populations. They pracitice what
I call conman's totalitarianism: Claiming to embrace liberty while
dictating to people how they can think, how they can look, and what
life they can have.
There are checks on official power;
there should also be checks on unofficial power. While there are laws
to fight corruption in business, there are none to fight oppression
in societies. Individuality should be affirmed and protected, and
conformity pressures must be counteracted. Libertarians focus their
scrutiny on the government. They should be extending the same
scrutiny to social entities all around the world.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home