Tuesday, December 05, 2017
The same people who embraced
existentialism and the idea that we are victims of life later
embraced the New Age and the idea that everything that happens to us
is our doing.
Both were wrong.
In some cases someone really is an
unwitting victim. A child who dies of famine is not responsible for
what has happened to him. In case of adults – especially in America
– they very much can do something to improve their condition, and
“professional victims” require an attitude adjustment. However
even they are limited in some ways, and some things – such as
flying to Mars – they cannot do however strong or responsible they
become.
The existentialist fails to practice
responsibility, and the New Ager fails to practice compassion. Once
again, some things we can control, and others we cannot. We are
neither animals nor God. We can control some things but not others.
Both existentialists and New Agers fail
to have an ethical perspective. Whether you see yourself as a victim
of life or whether you blame others for everything that happens to
them – or everything that you are doing to them - you will do
wrong. I see no valid reason for either ideology. Once again, some
things you can control and others you cannot control. By all means
encourage responsibility, but do not blame people for things that are
not their doing or claim to be God.
Does positive thinking create positive
reality? I do not believe that it does. However positive you get, if
you are burning the rainforest, the rainforest is burned. However
positive you get, if you poison the air, the air is poisoned. Nor are
all “negative thinkers” evil, although some are. I see no reason
at all to embrace either positive thinking or negative thinking. Both
create more problems than they solve. The first fails to see where
things could go wrong, and the second capitulates to whatever
problems are happening without doing anything to solve them. Neither
is right.
If you are a teenager, existentialism
is appealing because you are not in control of your life. If you are
an adult, the New Age is appealing because you are. However deciding
that everyone is responsible for everything that happens to them is
both cruel and unethical. Once again, some things we can control,
others we cannot.
I do not come in with the attitude that
I can do everything. I come in with the attitude that I can do some
things, some of them meaningful and important. I cannot fly to Mars.
However I can deconstruct false beliefs, which I am doing with two of
them now.
So I would not recommend either
existentialism or the New Age. I would recommend Christianity. The
Bible acknowledges that God is the maker of reality and that we have
been given some powers but not others. And it provides a real ethical
structure that both existentialism and New Age lack.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home