Thursday, December 07, 2017
The biggest challenges that people face appear to be in
implementing what is most central to them. The World War II
generation wanted peace, prosperity and national greatness, and it was
challenged with a depression and a war. The baby boom generation
wanted personal freedom, and it was challenged with a rigid social
order. Gen-Xers wanted structure, stability and service, and they
were challenged with social chaos and unchecked self-justified
selfishness that told them that they needed to have a positive
outlook and high self-esteem before they could do anything of merit
even as it was stomping upon whatever positive things they did and
put the world into a sorry shape in which positive outlook was not
justified. And many in my generation wanted beauty and love, and we
were challenged with toxic feminism and toxic psychology that
wrongfully saw such things as narcissism or misogyny.
It appears that this is how things are
intended to be. It appears that we must rise above such things or
else live desperate lives. And it appears that, in order to do so, we
need to rise above our own natures and do what is not in our natures.
For science, reason and democracy to
come into existence during Enlightenment, they had to convince people
that they would be done in an ethical manner. For a long time the
reputation, as Luther stated, was that “reason is a whore.”
Scientific intelligence was forbidden because it was seen as
unethical and morally corrupt. So Enlightenment people had to
practice strong ethical conduct in order to convice the world to
allow science and discovery, as well as of course democracy.
For passion and the arts to come into
existence during Romanticism, they had to convince people that they
possessed an underlying logic. At the time the claim was that such
things were irrational and were held in low esteem. Through the
efforts of genius authors such as Rousseau, Thoreau, Wordsworth,
Goether, Keats, Schiller, Mary Shelley and Blake, who knew how to
reason while being passionate and creative, passion and creativity
were rationally vindicated. This allowed such things to lay a claim
on life. They were also seen as immoral; and it took Schiller with
his concept of “beautiful soul” to show that there was in fact an
ethic to them as well.
Religion, for its part, has also had to
show that it is intellectually and scientifically valid. For a long
time religion was seen as backward, stupid or ignorant, so it had to
use scientific fact and philosophical reasoning in order to regain
credibility. So there were Christian intellectuals using
postmodernist arguments to validate Christianity and Christian
scientists using scientific discoveries to make a credible case for
creationism.
In all cases the process of bringing
such things into the world improved them. The reasoning types were
improved by having to act ethically. The creative and passionate
types were improved by having to master reason. And the religious
people were improved by having to learn science and philosophy and
use both to re-empower their religion.
Similarly all of the generations listed
above were improved by having to make happen what they valued in the
conditions that they faced.
With such things as imagination and
creativity, it took the scientific discoveries of Einstein to
vindicate them. This great scientific mind said that “imagination
is more important than knowledge.” We also see medical doctors and
scientists such as Karl Jung and Deepak Chopra supporting things such
as Eastern spirituality, that mainstream science holds in low regard,
by appealing to quantum mechanics and higher mathematics. These
people used science to validate what many consider unscientific and
give such things greater credibility than they would have had if they
did not have credible scientists speaking in their favor.
Similarly, for women to gain economic
and political power, they had to convince men that they had
rationality and ethics – things that many people thought that women
lacked. They also had to cultivate courage and strength, which once
again many people thought that women lacked. The more women were able
to do this, the more they gained economically and politically. Then
feminist women decided that feminine women were weak and stupid. This
stereotype was overcome by Olympic champion skier Julia Mancuso, who
won the competition while wearing a tiara. It continues being
challenged by Russian women, who tend to be feminine without being
either stupid or weak.
By themselves, most of the above can go
wrong. But when they have to master the previous level in order to
bring themselves into life, they improve. They then need to maintain
this improvement in order to give themselves a positive reputation.
Failure to do so harms others of similar propensities who follow
them. Success in so doing makes their path easier.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home