Monday, September 10, 2018
One of the most misguided statements
I've heard came from a brilliant young woman who said that if she
cannot live for herself then she cannot live. This is beyond wrong.
There are many valid reasons to live besides yourself. You can live
for your family. You can live for your country. You can live for God
or for a cause. People should not be kept from living for these
things, nor should they be coerced into living for themselves.
A related claim is that, unless you
have high self-esteem, you have nothing to offer others. Also
completely untrue. There are many things that one stands to offer
whatever his level of self-esteem. In my case, I've had to offer
passion, affection, financial grounding and making the other person's
concerns my own, which I then put vast energy into addressing.
Self-esteem has nothing to do with it one way or another.
Then there are claims such as that love
is a search for external validation. It is about no such thing. It is
not about what you feel about yourself; it is about what you feel
about the other person. Ayn Rand said, “Before one can say I love
you one first has to say the I.” Completely wrong as well. It is
once again unrelated to how one feels about himself. It is about the
other person, not about yourself.
Now supporting selfishness is bad
enough; but it is much worse to make a religion of it and to
persecute all other ways. If a naturally altruistic, brilliant woman
gets it drilled into her head that she needs to live for herself,
that is beyond wrong. She should instead be encouraged to live for
others. Doing which, as I have myself experienced, can be highly
fulfilling and also do wonders for one's self-esteem.
So it is time that these wrongful
attitudes be challenged and confronted. You do not have to live for
yourself, nor is it necessary to work on self-esteem. You can live
for whatever it is that you find meaningful. And then self-esteem and
other goodies will follow.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home