Wednesday, May 27, 2015
In recent weeks,
Australia has been tuned to its TV sets on a matter that involved two
Australian men being executed in Indonesia for drug smuggling. There
are several issues here.
One is that death is
too harsh a penalty for drug smuggling, and that more humane
treatment is necessary. Another is that these men made Australia look
bad in a foreign country.
When English soccer
fans made asses of themselves during the 1998 World Cup in France,
the English sports minister called them a bunch of drunken brain-dead
louts. He wasn't trying to excuse their behavior; he made it clear
that the English government did not support it. The Australian
government must make clear that it does not support these people's
behavior. Then it must say that the punishment given out to them was
inhumane, and that the contemporary world deserves better.
Among people
commenting on this matter, one – an Australian – stated that his
compassion resources were already highly taxed by people undergoing
severe oppression, and that he had none left for the men who went
into a foreign country and broke its laws. Certainly people who break
a law in a foreign country make their home country look bad. That
does not merit capital punishment; it merits recognition that it is a
wrong thing to do.
So there you have
it. Death punishment is too harsh for the crime committed; but these
people are clearly in the wrong. They should have been extradited to
Australia and tried there. And if that had been the case, the
Australians would have been able to tell these people just what they
think of them and how much of an embarrassment to Australia they have
been.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home