Saturday, July 15, 2017
In recent years, we have been hearing
thought that good people follow all rules of whatever society they
inhabit, and that the people who violate these are sociopaths and
narcissists.
I cannot begin to say just how wrong
that kind of thinking is.
Some societies are good; some are bad.
Most are good in some ways and bad in others. The people who follow
rules may do so for right reasons or wrong reasons. The people who
violate them may do so for right reasons or wrong reasons. If your
society tells you that you should throw sulfuric acid into the face
of a child for going to school, then that is a rule that you are
obligated to break.
Now. If the thinking such as I've
listed above is true, then the West in general – and America in
particular – owes most of what it has to narcissists and
sociopaths. This includes the institutions of liberty, which were put
into place in violation of the monarchic social order of the time –
an order that thought itself divinely ordained. This includes the
bulk of the West's industrial might. This includes most scientific
and literary accomplishments. All of these were put into place by
people who thought differently from the time and place and who would
be seen by such people as narcissists or sociopaths for that reason.
I do not see why someone who actually
is selfish or cold would be likely to be more present among rebels
than among conformists. If someone cares only about himself, then he
will not care what climate he finds himself in. He will side with
whomever he thinks will win. If he thinks that rebels are ahead he
will go with rebels; if he thinks that conformists are ahead he will
go with conformists. We have seen any number of people who were
rebels in 1960s becoming conformists in 1980s and 1990s. That is
because these people went with whomever they thought were winning at
the time. As a person who's actually selfish would.
Therefore it makes no sense whatsoever
to look for sociopaths or narcissists among the rebels. Once again,
the selfish people pick whoever they think to be the winner; which
means that they will be among rebels during successful revolutions
and among conformists during times of social peace. The baby boom
generation has a reputation for selfishness, and as I've stated
before they went from rebels to conformists. I have also known people
who were in no way selfish or heartless go from conformists to rebels
when they were faced with corruption within the system.
Sometimes the rebel will be good,
sometimes he won't be. Sometimes the conformist will be good,
sometimes he won't be. Whatever order the conformist enjoys is owed
to people who once have been rebels. That is the case most vividly
with America; but it is also in many ways the case all over the
world.
Far be it from me to advocate rebellion
for the sake of rebellion. But when wrong things happen, a good
person is going to take the stance of the rebel. A person who does
this when it does not work in their best selfish interest is neither
a sociopath nor a narcissist. Such a person is less selfish than the
conformist and in many cases his moral superior.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home