Saturday, September 30, 2017
I closely know a number of
exceptionally attractive and kind-hearted women; and in many cases
their personal lives have not been all that good. Everyone wants
them. If they do not reciprocate the attentions they are seen as
bitches; if they do reciprocate the attentions they are seen as
sluts. In serious relationships such women evoke men's insecurities
that motivate many men to become abusive. Their negative experiences
lead many people to conclude that such women are doing the wrong
thing by being attractive and friendly, and that the correct solution
is to be unattractive and mean. And this – based on the experiences
of many women in the baby boom generation - has been the main thrust
of Third Wave feminism, particularly among American women in
Generation X and in my generation. Of course the world has not
benefited from that course of action one bit.
On a somewhat related subject, there
are many people who think that sex offenders cannot be rehabilitated
and should spend their whole lives behind bars. Their claim is that
there is no cure for sexual perversions. Now there may not be a cure
for sexual perversions, but there is certainly a cure for action on
sexual perversions, and it is known as self-control. Just about
anyone is capable of self-control; and that also includes people who
have committed sex crimes. That you feel an urge does not mean that
you have to act on it; and self-control is the correct solution to
this problem. Similarly I have seen it said on the Internet that if a
man has been beating a female partner then that is his nature and that that
is what he is going to do. This is completely wrong. He is not an
animal. He is a person. A person can control his actions whatever his
nature happens to be.
Similarly we are seeing many people now
claim that “narcissists” and “sociopaths” are evil and can
only be evil whatever they do. That is completely wrong as well.
Anything human is capable of choice. Anyone capable of choice is
capable of rightful choice. If someone is being selfish or unethical
the correct solution is to give the person a correct moral structure.
It is not demonization, it is not psychological evisceration, it is
not working on self-esteem, it is not trying to get them in touch
with their true self. It is giving a better way to relate to the
world and teaching the person to put that way into effect.
There are two major problems that stand
in the way of that, and they have very little to do with one another.
One is “research” that teaches people that some people never
change and that a person who has acted at any given point in time in
a manner that they regard to be sociopathic or narcisstic will do
that for the rest of their lives. Once again, that is completely
irrational. Anyone can choose to act rightfully. One outcome of this
attitude is that people will defend their actions, however wrong they
may be, to the point of death so as not to be seen as being
narcissistic or sociopathic, as being portrayed that way is an
equivalent of a death sentence. Another outcome of this attitude is
that people who have done work on themselves will continue to be seen
as evil, regardless of how much work they have done on themselves,
how hard they have worked and how much good they have done. Neither
of these outcomes is remotely desirable, and both are totally
self-defeating. In the first case the people cling to their bad
behavior. In the second case any effort to improve one's behavior is
rejected, and potential for positive action is denied. Both motivate
people to act in precisely the wrong way while preventing any effort
to improve their conduct or their character.
A bigger problem still is the fact
that, in an interconnected world, everyone influences everyone else
all the time. This will result in people's attitudes constantly being
challenged. There are any number of problems with that, but there is
one that is quite large that I have not seen adequately addressed. If
someone's values have been deconstructed, then he is left without
values; and a person without values is a monster, whether or not he
has anything wrong with his brain. So that when someone comes to
America from the former Soviet Union and has a strongly constituted
conscience whose basis is Communism, it will be deconstructed, and he
will be left without a conscience. The solution is not to demonize
such a person, but to create a better constituted conscience. And
looking for a better constituted conscience has been a major project
of my life – one that has taken me in a number of different
directions, some of them quite unlikely.
I find it fascinating how the same
people who started out as starry-eyed hippie idealists became raving
fascists. They started out thinking that all people are good; then
they decided that some people are evil and can only be evil whatever
they do. Neither attitude is correct. Anything that is capable of
choice can be good, bad, indifferent or a mix. It is just as wrong to
demonize people as it is to idealize people. Anything capable of
choice is capable of both right and wrong. The correct solution, once
again, is to have a righfully constituted conscience. And if someone
has done something bad when his conscience was deconstructed, that
does not make him an inhuman monster. It means that he was wandering
in the wilderness, as many people are prone to doing in a world where
everyone is constantly influencing everyone else and very few people
can get away with a wrongfully constituted conscience or bigoted
convictions with which they were raised.
The latter state of affairs, Scott
Lasch stated as my generation being at sea. This is correct. Once
again, in a world where everyone is influencing everyone else we will
rarely find people who act like a rock. We will find less integrity,
but we will find more knowledge of other ways of thinking. The
biggest problem with that so far, once again, is that in such an
arrangement many people do not have a stable conscience, and any
number of them do not have a functional moral structure. That will
motivate even the more naturally honest people to act like
sociopaths; and that is not good either for them or for the world.
How to solve this problem? I would say
that the Bible has the solution to issues of this nature, and that is
the solution that I have chosen to take. Of course we are now seeing
many people take the reverse route and leave their Christian
upbringing to partake of things such as atheism or feminism. I will
caution these people that there are dangers ahead, and I will say
that Christ has been doing work on me that I have never seen a
psychologist, a thinker or a guru begin to equal. We are dealing here
with greater wisdom than anything else that is out there, and if you
are looking for a functional moral structure then this is the correct
direction to take.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home