When someone on an Internet forum
called Donald Trump a misogynist because he called some woman a dog,
I pointed out that the fact that he did not like one woman did not
mean that he did not like any of them. Someone responded by saying
that if he says that about any woman he is a misogynist.
By that standard just about any woman
is a misandrist because she would call Ted Bundy a dickhead.
When dealing with human beings, it is
to be expected that they will like some people and not others. That
is the case both with women and with men. Some people appear to be of
the opinion that liking women who act in the way of which one
approves, and disliking those who do not, are an attempt to control
women. Yet women, too, like men who act in a way of which they
approve and not men who do not. Similarly they extend the same
partiality to women who act in a way of which they approve and not
women who act in a way of which they do not. Expecting anything else
is not enlightenment or anything of the sort. It is failure to
understand people. People will like those who act in a way of which
they approve, and they will dislike those who act in a way of which
they do not approve. The feminists of course do the exact same thing.
So for a long time these women have claimed anyone who had
disagreement with their party line, no matter how minor, as a
misogynist or worse. Yet they have themselves proven to be completely
misogynistic as well as more abusive than most men. They have been
viciously abusive to women who were nicer and prettier than
themselves. They have been viciously abusive to men who like such
women. They have fomented the worst hysteria in the history of
America, claiming cruelly and in violation of all reason that some
people are basically inhuman and can only be evil whatever they do.
As for their claim that beauty is relative or anything of the sort,
it is refuted by their own behavior. They attack women who are
attractive and not women who are not attractive; which means that
they know what beauty is and what it is not, and their claims on this
matter are a pack of lies.
In the process they claimed themselves
to be enlightened. In fact the women whom they attack are vastly more
enlightened than they are. The “feminists” come from a place of
hatred and viciousness. The women whom they attack, for the most
part, bear them no ill will and, in my experience, have even been
willing to help them. They think that they speak for humanity and
that attractive women are basically not human. They think that many
men are basically not human. Meanwhile they have themselves shown
what is often exceptional cruelty; and it is in every way correct
that such women be called femi-Nazis.
Why am I writing this? Mostly to
get their crap out of my head, which has been stuck there since
mid-1990s. Also to help others get their crap out of their heads as
well. It is valid to forgive one's transgressors, but it is not valid
to allow fascist attitudes to dominate the society. It is important
that more people repudiate this fascism and overcome it. It is
important that freedom, honesty, and – yes – love and beauty –
have currency in the world.
At this point these people will say
that I am dangerous. I hope to be dangerous to them; I hope that more
people be dangerous to them. Once again, we are seeing here a very
real fascism. And it then becomes incumbent on anyone who holds
things such as liberty dear to fight this fascism.
Is all feminism bad? No, there have
been good things that have come out of feminism. This direction
however is wrong absolutely. This is fascism done in the name of
feminism. And that is no more valid than what existed in the Soviet
Union. If there is such a thing as danger to the institutions of
liberty, this is it.
Now I started out on the Left, but I
have come to respect a number of people who are conservatives. I
would most certainly rather be dealing with people such as the
conservatives I know than with such women. A former classmate of mine
has become a successful salesman and manager and married a Russian
woman. He says that their marriage is great. I recommend that more
men in America and other places in which these ideas propagate go
with women from places such as Russia, who have much more of a sense
of perspective and know what abuse and misogyny is and what it is
not.
Back to the original point, is Donald
Trump a misogynist? I do not believe that he is one. He does not hate
women. He likes some women and dislikes other women. That is not
misogynistic. That is human. Once again, most women like some men and
not others, and that does not mean either that they are misandrists
or that they are seeking to control men.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home