Monday, October 02, 2017
Just about any new thing goes through
birth pangs, and in many cases the immature manifestations of things
are destructive. Many get better as they mature. When I first began
developing my opinions, my expressions of them were angry, they were
rude and they were mean. Now, after putting significant intellectual
effort into developing my opinions, I can express them in a calmer
and more reasonable manner.
We see this with both liberalism and
the Christian Right. The 1960s liberals were seen as irresponsible
and unrealistic, and the Christans were seen as stupid bigots. Both
have improved their operations. The liberals became more informed and
more effective, and the Christians expanded their worldview and have
been in many cases doing actual good. The original manifestations
were flawed in many ways; the mature manifestations have become a lot
better.
It appears the nature of most things in
their original stages to be flawed. One starts on a journey on which
there are few stars on the perimeter. Where one goes, either people
have not gone before or they have gone before one's time or, if they
have gone in one's time, were suppressed. One is groping in the
darkness, and one frequently makes mistakes. But in any number of
cases he emerges with valuable insight or valuable new directions.
The original cause is frequently not
rationally known, or at least not well expressible. If the culture is
turned against love, then people who seek to embark upon love are at
a disadvantage. They do not have knowledge or practice or support. If
they fail – being as they are at a disadvantage – then that feeds
the cultural claims that love is a myth or a racket or mental
illness; which reinforces the widely held falsehood. However they do
part of the job to help pave the way for others on the same journey,
and that makes what they do a contribution to society.
Of course anything new will be seen by
somebody as being disruptive, and that would feed the claim that it
is bad. However everything that they have was once new, and that
means that it was disruptive to somebody. That does not make it bad.
Electricity was disruptive to candle makers, but that does not damn
electricity. The American Revolution was disruptive to English
monarchy, but that likewise does not make it bad.
Original manifestations of electricity
were clumsy. The American Revolution had to involve a war. The ideas
behind American democracy were in contradiction to the order of the
day and were ridiculed by many. We see any number of similar things
with just about anything that is new.
Are there bad things that come about?
Of course there are. There are plenty of new things that are no good.
The question that needs to be asked, when faced with anything that is
new, is, What would be its mature manifestation? Once again, immature
manifestation of things are flawed in most cases. Many get better as
they mature; some get worse.
So yes, the immature manifestations of
things – both good things and bad things – will be obnoxious in
some ways. That is not because of the thing itself; that is because
it is an immature manifestation. The important question to ask, once
again, is, What would this thing be like if it becomes mature? And
then it becomes possible to see which beginnings lead to bad outcomes
and which beginnings lead to good ones.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home