Saturday, December 30, 2017
A big deal has been made about Russia's
supposed interference in America's presidential campaign.
A bit of history.
In 1996, America and other Western
countries poured a lot of money into Boris Yeltsin's re-election
campaign. Yeltsin was very unpopular at the time, as the place was a
complete mess. So how can they logically forbid places like Russia
from interfering in their own campaigns?
The most ironic thing about this is
that for a long time Russia has been identified with Communism; but
here they supported the Republican candidate. At least on social
issues, Russians are much closer to Republicans than they are to
Democrats. Russians are a highly gendered population, and they also
are good at producing real literature and real art. So it would come
as no surprise that they would support a candidate who believes in
traditional roles and who also has an excellent taste in architecture
and has commissioned some of America's most beautiful buildings.
Now of course the Russian government
may have much different reasons for supporting Donald Trump, who
appears to be good friends with Putin. It is correct to say that
other countries should not be meddling in America's elections, but
here we see something very interesting. The kind of people who are
most vocal about this stance are the right-wingers, and the
right-wingers benefited from Russia's interference in America's
elections. Whereas many Democrats are internationalists, and in this
situation they lost out.
Sometimes it works to think things
through before formulating policy. If you want greater engagement
with the rest of the world, then this kind of thing will happen. If
there is a one-world government with everyone having a vote, then it
would be the Muslims and Hindus that command vast power around the
world. And Muslims and Hindus are not known for being feminists.
So we are seeing the logical outcome of
some of the stances that we have seen. And this outcome has hurt
mostly the people who have that stance. At which point it will become
incumbent upon the Democrats to either correct their stance or live
with its consequences. And this consequence is completely logical
according to their own beliefs.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home