God, Common Sense, Reason And Global Warming

Among the deniers of global warming, there are some who swear by God, some who swear by common sense, and some who swear by reason. All of them are wrong.

To address the first group: I doubt that God would be happy about you destroying what He has created and what you cannot conceivably recreate.

To address the second group: It is common sense that, if you raise carbon dioxide emissions while cutting down trees to absorb carbon dioxide, you will have problems.

And to address the third group: It is irrational to deny reality.

Instead the people who swear by such things honestly would be doing what they can to stop global warming. From the religious standpoint, we are meant to be responsible stewarts of our resources. From the commonsensical standpoint, you do not shit where you eat. And from the rational standpoint, we have to use our brains to create and implement better technologies.

Technologies that stand to give people everything they have now, and more, with vastly fewer destructive effects than the current technologies.

I so happen to be privy to one such technology. It is called the Hydrogen Transmission Network (HTN). HTN (http://htnresearch.com) will use solar power to break down ocean water into hydrogen and oxygen and send hydrogen through special safety-assured pipes to places of energy and water consumption, there to be reacted using fuel cells with oxygen in the air to create clean energy and clean water at once. A single network of hydrogen pipes will replace both the electric grid and the water delivery system, providing for humanity's water and energy needs through a single non-polluting process.

A person who swears by God, or by common sense, or by reason, should welcome this technology. It will deliver people everything that they have now and more while ending the burden on nature. It is true to God that we need to be responsible, and that means first and foremost environmentally responsible. It is commonsensical that a single network is better than two networks. And it is rational to use technologies that are brain-intensive rather than resource-intensive to provide for people's needs at present or greater levels with much fewer destructive effects.

So it is time that arguments of the deniers be stood on their heads. Once again, Christian religion, common sense and reason all favor clean energy technologies. And it is time that people who swear by such things see the promise of clean energy and get to work putting in solutions such as the HTN to meet people's energy needs.