Wednesday, November 21, 2018
Everyone wants to see what they do as
important; and in many cases they create virtual religions toward
that effect. Some of what they postulate is right, and some isn't.
It is valid to say that language has
effect on how we think. It is not valid to say that language
construes reality.
It is valid to say that in many
situations people can find solutions to their problems. It is not
valid to say that all problems that a person may experience is due to
negativity in his consciousness.
It is valid to say that money has vast
influence. It is not valid to say that “money talks, bullshit
walks.” There were many situations in history in which the poorer
party conquered the wealthier party; and while money very much does
talk in many situations, it is not the only thing that does.
It is valid to say that logic is a
useful form of cognition. It is not valid to see it as the only valid
form of cognition or to see anyone using anything other than logic as
fools, lunatics and conmen. And it is especially not valid to see the
spiritually inclined as illogical or irrational. In many cases they
have had very real experiences. When confronted with something that
contradicts one's worldview, the logical thing to do is to correct
the worldview. And as someone who started out as a militant atheist,
I can say with full certainty that I do not have the luxury of
skeptical beliefs if I am at all to be honest.
My mother, who came close to being
accepted into mathematical program in Soviet Union, said that
mathematics is queen of science. Once again, nobody questions the
importance of mathematics; but there are many important sciences,
mathematics being only one of them.
Once again, it is valid to see what you
do as important. It is not valid to think that it is the only thing
that is important, or to accept wrongful attitudes as part of what
you do. Language, money, what's in your consciousness, all matter.
However don't tell me that you are construing reality with language,
or that unless I have billions of dollars I don't stand to have
credibility, or that, if I were to rape you and kill you, it would be
your fault rather than mine.
Separate the valid from the invalid.
And then arrive at correct use of – language, money, logic,
consciousness, and everything else that is there.
Thursday, November 15, 2018
The Promise Of Hydrogen
In 1990s, there was talk that biotech
industry would be for the next decade what computer industry was for
1990s. I knew that that was crap. There is a lot more that can be
done with computers than with biotech; and while I expect biotech to
be a solidly growing field I do not expect it to ever become as big
as computers.
There is however a field that can
become as big as the computer industry. That field is hydrogen
energy. Hydrogen can create clean energy and clean water at the same
time. Going to hydrogen will create millions of jobs in both
engineering and construction, and that will achieve economic benefit
comparable to that of the computer industry.
Hydrogen can be derived from ocean
water using solar energy. Both ocean water and solar energy are
abundant, and neither is at the risk of running out. Hydrogen from
the reaction can then be sent through special safety-assured pipes to
places of energy and water consumption, there to be reacted with
atmospheric oxygen to create both energy and water.
Now there are some people who claim
that hydrogen is dangerous and unstable; but in fact a hydrogen
transmission network has been operating in Germany for decades
without problems. All you need to do is create double pipes – glass
on the inside, steel on the outside – with sensors and valves in
the middle to shut off flow in case of a pressure drop. That makes it
at least as safe as current technologies.
Hydrogen economy will replace the
electric grid and the water delivery system with a single seamless
network. Vast amount of jobs will be realized during its
construction; and vast savings will be realized over the long term.
The people who have been displaced through flight of jobs abroad will
be gainfully employed once again. And that will do more to support
American jobs than any amount of tariffs or quotas against foreign
imports.
While the utility of biotech is
limited, the utility of hydrogen is vast. We are talking here about a
technology that stands to fuel the world. We are talking here about a
technology that stands to create millions of jobs in both engineering
and construction. We are talking here about a technology that stands
to replace inefficient, polluting technologies with a technology that
is efficient and non-polluting.
I highly recommend doing more research
into the matter. On my part I am promoting a Hydrogen Transmission
Network (http://htnresearch.com).
To the people who think that oil is progress and clean energy is
stagnation: The opposite is the case. Hydrogen is a path toward
better technology. To the people who think that global warming is a
ploy for government takeover of the economy: Hydrogen economy can be
put into place by business as well as it can be put into place by
government. I, for one, don't care for a moment who does it for as
long as it gets done.
So that while the utility of biotech is
limited, the utility of hydrogen is enormous. And putting into place
the hydrogen technology will create prosperity comparable to what was
created in 1990s by the computer industry, with vast benefits for
people living now and people living in the future.
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Government Corruption And Private Corruption
I have heard it said that a government
big enough to give you everything that you want is also big enough to
take away from you everything that they have.
Of course this is in no way limited to the government; and a private sector economy that is big enough to give you everything that you want is also big enough to take away from you everything that you have.
I see no reason at all to see the
government entities as being qualitatively different from private
entities. Both are composed of people – whether regarded as sinful
or regarded as good – and I see no reason to see one as better or
worse than the other. I come from the Soviet Union, and I've also
lived in America and Australia. In all cases I have heard some horror
stories. However while in the Soviet Union the perpetrator was the
government, in America and Australia the perpetrators were private.
Brutal and incestuous parents, mafia and the gangs, corrupt entities
in business, old boy networks, venal small towns, corrupt courts,
were the perpetrator in America and Australia. Which means that to
actually stand up for liberty and righteousness one needs to confront
these entities.
That is not what we are seeing from the
libertarians. They attack an entity that is easy to attack –
Western governments, which are for the most part quite benign. They
rightfully see potentials for corruption in governments, but they
fail to see them in entities that are not the government. This then
allows entities such as communities built on incest to direct the
libertarians' fire against entities fighting incest under the claim
that they represent government overreach. Under the rubric of
fighting the government, private corruption puts the libertarians in
its service.
That governments are capable of
wrongdoing, everyone knows. But not everyone sees the private
corruption. From the standpoint of the person being abused, it does
not matter if it is the government doing it or the town old-boy
network; abuse is still perpetrated. And fighting abuse in places
such as America means fighting these corrupt entities, not fanning
New World Order conspiracy theories or becoming fools for an
incestor's lie.
So that while governments are capable
of doing wrong, they are not the only entities that are capable of
doing wrong. And while government is being subjected to adequate
scrutiny in Western democracies, corrupt private entities are not.
Which means that to truly be fighting for liberty and righteousness,
one has to confront these entities.
And until they do so, libertarians have
no business claiming to be defenders of freedom.