Sunday, December 31, 2017
There have been some participants in
the economy that have been adequately championed. Adam Smith
championed the businessman; Karl Marx championed the worker; and the
lesser-known Thorstein Veblen championed the engineer. But there
have been other major participants in the economy that have not been
adequately championed. These include:
The scientist;
The teacher;
The military;
The police;
The priest;
And the artist.
Most of what business sells is
technology, and technology comes from science. There have been many
places that had the market system, and most of them were poor. The
reason that we are more wealthy than Medieval Europe or Tsarist
Russia is technology; and technology comes from science.
Even the most anti-intellectual
American drives a truck that comes from science; has TV and telephone
that come from science; and uses such things as air conditioning and
boom boxes that come from science. Scientists are at the root of most
of what business sells. The scientist is not adequately compensated
for the work that he does; the businessman gets more than his fair
share.
Another significant contributor to the
economy is the teacher. The teacher educates both the businessman and
the worker. Without the teacher most people would be unemployable.
Many teachers are regarded as losers; however without them the
businessman would not have the knowledge that he needs to do his job,
and most workers would be unemployable.
Still another major contributor is the
military. The importance of the military was found out by Bertrand
Aristide, who disbanded the military only to be out of a job when
some drug runners got hold of major guns. There have been many
situations in which a poorer population conquered a wealthier
population. Both Russia and China had much more money than Genghis
Khan, but Genghis Khan conquered both populations because he was a
military genius who assembled an excellent army. America's solution
to this problem – to have effective military hardware – is a
correct one; and I completely endorse Reagan's doctrine of peace
through strength and hope that the present administration continues
this doctrine.
Also important is the police. The
police enforces property rights. Without property rights enforcement
economic activity would be impossible. Everything that people produce
would be pilfered, and the population would be plunged into poverty.
This happened in Russia in 1990s, when the police was incompetent and
the place was overrun by gangs. This continues to happen in the
American inner city, where law enforcement does not know what it is
doing and the conditions are so violent that no business would set up
shop there. Police is required for enforcement of property rights,
and without the police everyone would be very poor.
I have also not heard enough said in
defense of the priest and the artist. The priest is important because
he teaches people moral principles, which are necessary for economic
activity to take place. As for the artist, he is a visionary whose
inspiration anticipates much of what people figure out later with
their minds. Much of what we have now was anticipated by artistic
inspiration; and while most artists don't make very much money other
people make tons of money out of implementing their visions.
Most of the above don't make very much
money. However their contributions to prosperity are vast. A
scientist or a teacher does not earn a lot of money; and many of
these and others, being driven by the ideal of service, do not mind
that state of affairs. Where they do revolt – rightfully – is
when people decide that their work is worthless or that they are
losers or irresponsible or anything of the sort even as they are
benefiting from the work that they do. When they rail against and
defund science while benefiting from science. When they ride around
in trucks that science made possible with signs that say “My son
beat up your honor students.” When they go around disrespecting the
military while benefiting from its defense of their lives and
property, or when they tell a police officer “fuck you pig.”
Do I have personal reasons for saying
this? I most certainly do. I was planning an academic career; but
when I was at the university the academia was being defunded, and
prospects for an academic career were scant. I went into the computer
industry, and after that crashed I was under-employed. Probably the only good thing that came from that was me becoming acquainted with perspectives of people whose perspectives I otherwise would have never considered and gaining in compassion for other people. If I am to put
in the kind of effort that is needed to get a PhD or anything of the
sort, I have to know that the field will be there.
So it is time that more people
acknowledge these unsung heroes of economics. And it is time that
more of such people be treated with respect.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home